Yuku free message boards

Arthur O Podd wrote:

---

Mrs Rayment - You are indeed correct in remembering Dr Hovind's proof of the Flood origin of the Grand Canyon I will revisit this topic in a future series of posts 'Proof of the Flood'.

Young Jabe - Whenever Creationists point out out-of-place-artefacts (also known as OOPARTs), Darwinianists tie themselves in knots vehemently denying that such things exist. You are clearly no exception, coming up with an ad-hoc hypothesis without having seen any of the evidence. Would you also claim that the Ordivician strata in the Grand Canyon were placed under the other rocks recently? Also, please avoid ad-hominem attacks, they make you look weak. As for putting 'egh' at the end of a sentence, that makes you sound like a Canadianist, and are therefore clearly not to be trusted on anything.

Mrs Hicks - a charming notion, but Dr Hovind's Flood Theory is now the accepted scientific model.

Honestly Arthur, you seem like you must be an "imposter fundamentalist christian" on this board, your reasoning is that of a 5 year old's and your take on what is evidence of the Earth's age is hilarious!

But let's say you are in fact sincere, I would like to point out that while you cautioned "young jabe" not to use ad-hominem "attacks", your very next sentence blatantly included a very crude and childish ad-hominem attack. You should also learn how to spell. As for the burrito, which really makes your post seem like a joke, but if it wasn't, I'd like to add that the burrito originated in the 1840's and the Grand Canyon was discovered in by the first European in 1540...so the burrito was obviously placed there by someone after the grand canyon was made and has nothing to do with the age of the grand canyon, which is proven by science to be on the order of millions of years old.

And what is "bible based carbon dating?"